After reflecting on the rhetorical
and visual analysis essay I think it went better than the photo essay. I have
more experience rhetorically analyzing literature and incorporating the visual
component was not that difficult, especially because of examples from the book Compose Design Advocate. However, I did
have an issue with the time span of the essay. It seems we were given much
longer or an extension to the due date on the photo essay, and much less time
for this one. I still managed to get everything done on time though, but I feel
like I could have produced a better quality essay if I was given more time or
at least had a more organized peer review session.
I believe
I ended up following my design plan pretty well, and since I got to change and
tweak my design plan before I turned in my essay, I got them both to match
pretty nicely. I ended up only using 4 visual examples instead of 5 because I was
already over the word limit, and I also decided to keep the photos in line of
the text instead of presented before their corresponding paragraphs and almost
separate. I did this because it essentially has the same effect while also
saving space. My ethos, logos, and pathos arguments started off strong but
general, and as the essay moves along they become more specific. Since all
these ads essentially have the same method of presenting things to the
audience, I didn’t want to repeat myself so I left out some analysis in later
paragraphs if I already mentioned it before. I think I involved and made my
evolving thesis clear enough and the general format and flow of the essay is
smooth.
No comments:
Post a Comment